Tuesday, July 5, 2011

End of unit PLTS assesment table


Jack Silkstone
Olly Smith
Frankie Cooney
Abi Lee
Self Manager




Effective Participator




Reflective Learner




Creative Learner




Independent Enquirer




Team Worker






This is how I now see me and my group at the end of the unit. As you can see, I’ve finally given myself a few greens within reflective learner and team worker. This is because now we’ve been working together for so long, I feel we have all at some point proven that we can everything that is necessary within the team worker section. I’ve also put reflective learner up as with all the blog posts they are being reflective in their ways, learning from the past. Olly went up in the criteria’s with me, and Frankie was already borderline all of them anyway, so it didn’t take much. As with before, it’s damn near impossible for Abi to improve much more, but she has shown improvements within all areas, despite already being so high.

Monday, July 4, 2011

Personal Learning and Thinking Skills - Group Performance Skills

Effective Participator

Discuss & Resolve Concerns;

The group were expressing concerns over afew members inability to remember lines, as if they were not properly rehersing them. After a brief bu deep and calm discussion the membersi n question got their act together and returned with near perfect line memory, resolving the issue entirely.

Present a persuasive case for action;

At the begging of the unit, every student was required to attempt to persuade the rest of those on the unit towards their cause. I presented a case for a peice on the Justice system, something that is taught in passing to the generations, and requires greater understanding to properly grasp it. Obviously, mine didn't go through, and we ended up with Gender equality. Honestly, this was the more persuasive case, and had the most research and backing behind it.

Propose practical ways forward, breaking these down into manageable steps;

This was done within the generation of the music to be used within the peice. The song was first discussed, broken down to it's cords, It was then seperated up into the instruments to be sent and rehersead seperatly with some collabartion from the group. Then the instrumental was recorded. Over this, the vocals were recorded and placed.

Identify improvements;

Identyfying the advancement of the music as it evolved from one stage to the other, and as cords were eddited and the tempo changed. Also with the addition of new instruments.

Influence others, balancing diverse views;

Creative differences within the group were balanced based upon the practicality and involvment of the set; from the position of the moveable rail pecie, to the narrators table and the "bed steps".

Act as an advocate for views and beliefs that may differ from their own;

The role I was placed in was highly and noticably sexist, while I am averted to sexism and look down upon it's acts.

Team Worker

Collaborate with others towards common goals;

There was a collaborative effort to move the set peices to their necercary positions for the changing of scenes withing the peice, namely the movement from the "House" to "Emily Bile Set".

Reach agreements, managing discussions to achieve results;

Dissucsions about rehersal schedual were inputted by all members to allow for the best times without interference from other workloads.

Adapt behaviour to suit different roles and situations, including leadership roles;

I had to move in character onto the set and settle down in the bed as if my que was given when my que line was missed, without being conspiquios and obviously confused, adapting to the situation as it were.

Show fairness and consideration to others;

Acknowlagement of other ideas, and only chosing designs based on their practicle merit, and not the one propsing them.

Take responsibility;

Coloring of labels ready for performance day.

Provide constructive support and feedback to others;

All students gave constrictive feedback to other groups performances on what could have been improved, their group skills, and their personal acting skills.

Consideration of Health and Safety

Within the production of this we attempted to go about it's creation in realistic veiws. One such realistic thing that comes with nay performance is the health and saftey requerments of the venue to ensure both the actors and the audiances saftey in the event of an emegancy.

Inside the book "Practicle Theater: A post-16 approach" edited by Sally Mackery, there is small list of bullet points for consideration on page 367:
"·         means of access and escape;
 ·         public address installation;
 ·         the staging arrangements;
 ·         sight line;
 ·         production details; barriers and fencing;
 ·         the evacuation plan
 ·         mixers, delay towers and temporary towers;
 ·         policing, security and stewarding, first aid service and emergency provision."
The means of access and escape were easly identifyable within the performance, acces leading in from the front of the room, and a clearly marked fire escape to the outdoors at the back of the room close to the audiance.
 As we were only acting in a small space, public adress to the audiance was easly done via our own voice, and so no such installation of devices were neceracary.
The staging arrangements were gone over with the teachers in question, making sure that the performance space was clear for the props and actors to have ease of movement and acting.
I don't belive line of sight would have been an issue for any member of the audiance, with it being such a small space and everyone sat on the same level, they should have been easly aware of the stage and their enviroment.
 The production details had all gone through to the teacher for the performance to go ahead, everything that was both needed and easly viewed as not needed to know went through, to make sure that in any eventuality the health and saftey of all partys involved were taken into consideration.
As mentioned many times, it was a small audiance, and we're not exactly well known with hundreds of rabid "fangirls" to require barriers to be put in place to stop the audiance from getting to close to the production.
By now, I'm fairly certain that the evacuation plan of the school has been drilled, in most sences of the word, into the students and teachers. If an eventuality of an emergency arose, everyone would know what to do and do it calmly.
I honstly don't know what these things are, and since it was within an indoor enviroment, I'm fairly certain they wouldn't be possible anyway. I guess making sure that they were impossible before attempting any such thing is a part of health and safety.
All of there things are taken care of within the school enviroment, and so were of no concern to us.


In "Designing for the Theatre: Second eddition" by "Francis Reid", on page 47 there is a section on stability, an extract from which is:
"An aspect of which is perhaps related rather more to actors' confidence in saftey, rather than actual safety, is the stability of the scenery."
This holds true to us, as one of our set peices (a very major one) become extremely unstable, as one of the wheels broke befor the performance. This lead it to be unfit for health and saftey requirments, unless repaired. This worried us greatly, but thankfully it was in good condition for the final performance and so was able to be used without chance of breaking anything health and saftey realated. This also impared the movement of the set, which was of concern for both health and saftey and the integraty and pace of the production.

Evaluation of Performance

It was the performance day of the peice, and my group was the first one performaning. In early rehersals, part of the set broke. This all ammounted to an abundance of nerves that really started to not agree with my systems. It was looking rather bleak, but I hoped, I knew, that we aere going to pull through it.

When it came to the actual performance, the nerves were still there, and they never went within. Without the support of the group, we may not have done as well as we did. Everyone made sure the set peices were in place and safe. The movments were on time and specific. There were afew muck ups and line misses, but we were there, we movedinto the scene in character, got to where we needed to be for that line, and everything ran smothly.

Looking back on it now, the strongest part had to be the end "Emily Bile" section of the peice. It pulled the audiance into a "Jerry Kyle" type of show, with the characters still there and recogniseable. The audiance participation of this had the audiance at attention, and when asked were ready to answer with their thoughts.

I belive I articulated and projected my voice well on stage, at the correct level for the audiance being so close. I also displayed the ability of multi-rolling, if only barley, with my change from the Father to the Wolf character. Also, my movments and actions were beutfully over the top for the style of theater being produced.

By the end of the performance I felt relieved that it was finally over and all wnet well, with only minor mess-ups that were quickly and un-noticibly coverd up. And while I was happy that it was over, when it got to helping them with their questionaires I did feel abit useless because they were being very independant and I realy didn't know how to engage any of them.

The overall audiance responce was positive! They expressed that they enjoyed the characters, varying answers on who each preferd more, and most because of the humour given by the chracter. They also thought the set was well made and functioned well for its purpose.

The "workshop" segment of the peice was intergrated into the performance as whole as in the "Emily Bile" end scene, and so stood up and performaned as well as the rest of the performance did (with a couple of sign slip ups and set movement messups by me, but it didn't seem to detract from the peice much). In all honesty, it could have had more time put into it to make it longer and more informative to the audiance, but as it were it was perfectly acceptable.

If I had to work within this group again I'd probably attempt to take on more responsibility. The weight of the performance was rather focoused in this one, and it would have got things moving much faster if I brought responsibilities onto myself to get things sorted and ready on time and with purpose.

The main thing that would have improved the performance as a TIE company would have probably been experiance in this area. Our experiance of this form of drama is left wanting, mainly for the reason of this being more than likely the first time any of us has tried to educate within a performance, and set out to have a performance with a purpose other than to simply entertain. If we were more experianced in this area, our understanding and educational prioritys would be much greatly improved, and so too would the production.

Watching it back on the DVD, in all honesty, made me cringe. Apparently, despite trying to change the tone of my voice several times within that performance, there wasn't much a noticible change within it. All it just sounded like me to me. It appeard low budget and rather scraped together, with a scene or two that didn't make full sence, and alot of exits which could have been improved (Majority of those exits done by me). Everyone seemed to manage to create enough of a stage presence at the points they needed to be the focus at the right times, directing the audiances attention well, and the characters demena and personality was pretty consistent throughout the peice.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Personal Learnering and Thinking Skills table and evaluation

This is how I viewed me and my group at the begging of the unit in regards to the PLTS’.

Jack Silkstone
Olly Smith
Frankie Cooney
Abi Lee
Self Manager




Effective Participator




Reflective Learner




Creative Thinker




Independent Enquirer




Team Worker





While I may not have been holding the group back at the begging per say, I had the most reds and no greens. Olly has his drawbacks but he is a creative guy within music and on the fly ideas. Frankie didn’t fall short of anything, and balances with high-average and excellent. She did the main research for the facts and things that the piece was going to be about. Abi, on the other hand, seemed to be a natural at everything needed. She was a major part in the development of this, the basis of the actual performance in the begging came from her. But that isn't to say she fully took charge without a say from anyone else, she allowed everyone to have their say and pooled ideas together. She seemed to manage her time well with what was needed for the group out of her own private time, which allowed us to steam on. I tried hard to give her amber on this, but she never fell below the highest standards.
This is how I see us now

Jack Silkstone
Olly Smith
Frankie Cooney
Abi Lee
Self Manager




Effective Participator




Reflective Learner




Creative Thinker




Independent Enquirer




Team Worker





I’m still the least, but I have improved in Self Management and Team Worker, as I've integrated more into the group since the begging, and Olly has improved in Self Management with me, as we are now using more personal time to get tasks done quickly and correctly. Frankie has proven herself an effective team worker with significant improvement from my first views, but this improvement is more a case of being much better than expected, and while it may have looked like Abi was at the highest, she still proves to be improving in all areas with the constant script improvements and understanding.

I need to try and get myself into the green for a couple of them, and try to improve on reflective learning. Olly may need to try and do some independent research and enquiring of his own, and that may innately bump up his other areas. Frankie doesn't have far to go to get greens across the board, and Abi just needs to keep being Abi and nothing bad can happen.

I’ll be referring to this table and the PLTS’ in future and keep track of improvements, hopefully I’ll manage to give myself a green before the end.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

7th June- What to Achieve in the next 2 hours!

1. - Emote the lines properly
2. - Know stage directions with set pieces
3. - Devise questionaire

Additional rehersal for full set and dress for 2 hours after school on Thursday.

Monday, June 6, 2011

Comparative Review on Gail and Pavlar Interviews

While a good majority of this seems to near enough the same, there are parts in which the two differ. The major area  I see this is within the question "What styles of theater do you use?" Gail replied by saying that it isn't allways up to them, it's up to the ones who effectivley "order" the performance, while Pavlar said that theirs are primarly inspired by Brecht, with parts of Boal and Dorothy Hethcote. This shows that Blah Blah Blah seem to have more creative freedom on what they perform, as it is them who decides what it is they are performaing in what style. I wonder what brings about this difference?
There is also a difference on how long productions are in planning. For Gail, she said they plan two years ahead, while Pavlar says it depends on the budget and even after it's produced it is still constantly evolving. This may be down to the above, with one being comissioned on a certain style while to other gets to decide for themselves, but the fact that the timescales still differ so greatley is something that shows the un-even nature of this line of work.

Q & A with Pavlar Beier, Assistant Artistic Director of Blah Blah Blah

1.   1. Do you enjoy your job and what does it entail?

Yes, I really enjoy my job.  There’s so much diversity in what my day will be like from one day to the next. We have three strands of work in the company, our Residency Programme, where we work with schools more than once during a project, our Touring Programme where we take one-off participatory show to a school and finally, the Theatre Academy for young people aged 10-16 at the Carriageworks in Leeds.
In the Residency Programme I am often co-deviser and performer in the projects and also director when the teachers are involved in delivering the sessions alongside me.
In the Touring Programme I am often script editor and performer with the directing usually being done by Anthony, our Artistic Director.
I am not generally involved in he Theatre Academy strand of the company although I have on occasion run a workshop session with the young people who meet every Saturday afternoon.
 
2. How has technology influenced your work?

Technology doesn’t really influence the actual delivery of our work as we like to keep props and set simple, letting the children and young people stretch their own imagination-particularly in the residency work we do in primary schools.  Of course we rely very much on computers for accessing information during our research into new work, storing our database and communicating with schools when selling the work.  We are in the process of re-designing our website which is something we intend to make more use off when communicating with audiences.
 
3. How do you connect with different communities and audiences?
 
Intellectually and emotionally, we connect with our audiences by tailoring our work to suit our audience.  We don’t start from that point, but its very much part of the creative process.  We begin from a point where we look for a story we are interested in.  We explore that story and then we look at how it would work for a particular age group.
Physically, we connect with our audiences through our selling by advertising at events such as The Store (an event organised by Artforms, Education Leeds, where companies and artists set up a stall for a day and teachers come and see what’s on offer), phoning schools as part of a large selling campaign and word of mouth from current or past audiences. 
 
4. What has been you favourite project and how long did it take?
 
It’s hard to say what has been my favourite project as I always enjoy something from everything we do.  I have particularly enjoyed the different versions of a participatory show called ‘The Raft of the Medusa’ because of how it has developed over the years.  We have toured it to high schools in a few different guises- twice with the teachers who first devised it and performed it with Anthony and then twice as a Blahs tour with professional actors- we also took it to a children and young peoples theatre festival in Germany were I performed some of my role in German which was a great challenge for me personally and a really exciting opportunity.
Raft began its life back in 2006 as a touring piece but is now more of a showcase piece that we only bring out for festivals and conferences as a good example of our work.  Each time we put it back together we find new moments in it that get re-worked so it is a bit like a living organism!
 
5. What creative process do you use?
 
As I mentioned above, we tend to begin with a story or sometimes even a picture and the story behind it, which evokes an interest for us.  We begin to explore what those stories mean to us and why they are interesting- what is the hook that pulls us in.  Only after we have begun to develop an idea do we then look at how the piece could link o the criteria that schools might be interested in connecting with it.  Having said that, we also sometimes create work from a stimulus that teachers approach us with.  Or example, a school asked us recently to create a piece of participatory drama based on the circus as that was their topic next term, so we looked for a story that would be specifically relevant to that topic.
One of the first exercises we do when entering a new process is to ask ourselves ‘Who would I like to meet?’ in the story.  Then we set up improvised scenes where we meet the characters and ask ourselves, ‘where are they, what are they doing and when are they?’-at what point in the story do we meet them?  This is a really great was to explore peripheral characters or even characters whom we have invented within the context of the story.
 
6. Are there any age groups that are more difficult than others?
 
I don’t think that any age group is particularly more difficult, rather they present different challenges for us.  Much of our work is very transferable and pieces that we make for younger children would be just as accessible for older children, but the difference is in how much we challenge them during the drama.  We have to be in tune with our target audience in order to understand just how far and how deep we can go on a certain line of questioning.  Because what we do relies on the children’s responses to add detail to the story, if we have underestimated or overestimated how much they will take on, we are always ready to adapt our questioning on the spot to try and keep in line with where the children are at.  Children and young people of any age can be difficult to work with if they’re not interested in what you are doing with them.  That is the real challenge- to find something they are interested in so they engage you with you and want to join you in what you’re doing.
 
7. Is there a hierarchy of roles within the company?
 
Anthony Haddon is the Artistic Director of the company and he is answerable to our board of five directors.  Myself as Assistant Artistic Director, Maureen McGough who is our General Manager and Cas Bulmer who is our Tour Co-ordinator/Administrator are all answerable to Anthony.
Anthony has overall control over the direction the company will go artistically, I am involved in the decision making when it comes to planning the layout of the artistic programme and Maureen is in charge of the financial side to the company, while Cas is at the forefront of our contact with schools.
 
8. Do you use song and music?
 
Depending on the piece, yes we sometimes use music.  In our last tour Rumpus we had two actors and a musician who performed the two pieces to reception and Yr 1 children.  And in one of our residency pieces, Silas Marner, we have singing as a soundtrack at one point.  It is easy to forget just how powerful music can be in assisting the telling of a story by the emotion and the atmosphere it can evoke.  We are always open to incorporating music in our work where relevant.
 
9. Have you ever tried to act and direct in your own production?
 
In our Residency Programme, a lot of the time I am acting in a piece and directing myself.  Sometimes I work with primary school teachers where I direct them in to a piece of participatory drama that they will be acting with me.  Occasionally, I direct a freelance actor in a piece of residency work alongside myself too.
In our Touring Programme I am more often in an acting role being directed by Anthony.
 
10. How do you fund your productions?
 
We receive core funding from the Arts Council and the local authority as well as a certain amount of lottery funding.  We also submit bids to separate funding bodies for individual projects and we charge schools for the work we do with them.
 
11. How did you first get into TiE?
 
My degree at university was called Communication Arts: Specialism Drama and covered quite a broad scope of drama and theatre practices.  One of my final modules was Theatre in the Community.  I was really interested in making theatre for an intended audience who would be involved in the final performance in some way.  I was very fortunate that a lecturer of mine saw potential in me and took me under her wing when I graduated, getting me involved in youth arts projects and finally introducing me to the world of TiE.  It wasn’t of course down to her that I got involved in the work I did, but she encouraged me and pointed potential opportunities out to me.
 
12. What is the most challenging thing involved in TiE?
 
To continue pushing the quality of the work higher and higher- we are always looking at ‘raising the bar’ of Theatre in Education.
 
13. How long have you been working in TiE?
 
I graduated from university in 2001 and got my first professional acting job with the Blahs in 2002 on a TiE programme based on the story of Silas Marner.  I then worked as a freelance performer for four years working with theatre companies such as Tell Tale Hearts (children’s theatre) and Faceless (street theatre) as well as other TiE companies such as Alive and Kicking and Yorkshire Women Theatre.  In 2006 I became a full-time member of the Blahs as Theatre In Education Co-ordinator and then as Assistant Artistic Director in January 2011.
 
14. How long does it take to create a piece of TiE?
 
This can vary depending on how much time you actually have for a project.  Often, the budget we have for a project will determine how long we will have to initially develop a piece, but we like to come back to stories we have created again and again so that we revisit them and re-look at them to take them further.  The story of Silas Marner I mentioned above has been going since 1999 and has been toured as a show, as a four part participatory drama and now lives on as a two part participatory drama where teachers are involved in telling/acting the story alongside us.  This means that we are constantly finding new detail in the story even after all these years.
 
15. What styles of theatre do you use in your productions?
 
Our work is very influenced by Brecht in that we break down the fourth wall between the actor and the audience.  Other influences are object theatre and puppetry combined with live performers, image theatre of Boal and theatre conventions created by Dorothy Heathcote that come from her asking open questions which allow the audience to draw on their own knowledge and interpretation.
 
16. What styles of theatre do you create?
 
We create participatory theatre which combines all of the above.  We set out to work with small audiences so that we can make contact with all of them.  We want a genuine conversation with our audience within the structure of the story.
 
17. Is your work scripted or improvised?
 
The work we create is scripted.  If we are devising new work, these scripts are partially developed from improvised scenes we have been playing with in the rehearsal room and partially written by one or two members of the company.  In the past, in our touring work, we have devised and toured a show then commissioned a playwright to rework the piece and then we have retoured it.  As I mentioned in my answer to question 6, there are sometimes moments for improvisation in our work due to the nature of us placing so much importance on the participants’ responses.  We always try and work all the possible responses we might get while we’re rehearsing so that we’re prepares with an ‘improvised’ response ourselves.  Of course, we can’t always predict every possible answer and are often taken by surprise so still have to think on our feet!
 
18. Do you have a timeline for your rehearsals?
 
With a touring show using professional actors, we generally have three weeks rehearsal for a seven week tour.  This means that w have generous amount of time to work through a play in sections and then run the whole thing together towards the end of the rehearsal period.  However, in the residency work, I often have one day to take a teacher through a four session drama project we will be running together from start to finish so structuring a plan I advance for exactly what you will cover hour by hour in those sessions is really important- and sticking to time slots for each session is imperative too!
 
19. Are any age groups more difficult to perform to than others?
 
As I’ve said before, it all comes down to whether you can engage your audience well enough in the first place.  Sometimes older children and adults come into a performance with pre-conceived ideas of what to expect and if they haven’t had positive experiences of theatre or if they are particularly self-conscious, then they might be more hesitant and even reluctant to participate, but if you can grab their interest and simultaneously make them feel at ease, that usually subsides as they get caught up in the story.
 
20. Which age group do you prefer?
 
The majority of my work within the company is with primary age children and I really enjoy working with them as you can challenge the children in a different way.  Its really fun working with the lower end of the school as the children are so open and playful, but I particularly enjoy seeing older children being so engrossed in a story that they forget to keep up the attitudes they sometimes walk into the room with.  It’s also great that they are at an age where they will challenge what you are telling them or asking of them and you can enter a real dialogue with them.
 
21. Do you think going to young people is better or having young people come to you?
 
We don’t have children/YP coming to us as our aim is to take theatre into places it’s not usually associated with.  Using space familiar to the children and young people- i.e. their own classroom or school hall- in an imaginative way by transforming it is one of the reasons that we do this.
 
22. What are your responsibilities as an artistic project manager and director?
 
At present I a leading the Residency Programme within the company and am responsible for most of the teacher CPD programmes we run.  For these smaller scale programmes, I liaise with schools on the content of the work, devising the new material if it is to be a new piece, timetabling with the project and then I rehearse the teachers into the work.  Finally, I perform with the teachers when we deliver the work to the children.  So I am co-ordinator, deviser, director and performer on a lot of these projects (sometimes even a designer and prop-maker if we have a very small budget!).  I also sometimes attend conferences and festival on behalf of the company.
 
23. How many people are involved in each project?
 
In the Residency Programme it is usually myself and two teachers from each school.  Occasionally we may have a designer who works with us or Anthony might be in a project too.  In the Touring Programme, the teams can range from three to five actors, with Anthony performing as well as directing the show.  Behind the scenes, Cas it the person selling and co-ordinating the tour and Maureen not only works out the budgets for the projects in the first place but also draws up the contacts for each school and chases up payment.
 
24. How do you know when a project was/is successful?
 
We ask for feedback from schools we have worked with.  With the touring work we have feedback forms which we ask both the teachers and the young people to fill in directly after the show and with the residency work we often have evaluation meetings with the teachers about their experiences of being in a TiE team and also what they saw the children’s experiences to be.  And of course, if someone comes back to us the next year wanting our work again, we know they value it.